Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Trevathan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1952No. 18PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.

This appeal falls under the ban of the general rule that ordinarily an order allowing a motion for the joinder of an additional party is not appealable. In consequence, it must be dismissed. Raleigh v. Edwards, 234 N.C. 528, 67 S.E. 2d 669; Golbert v. Collins, 227 N.C. 395, 42 S.E. 2d 349; Insurance Co. v. Motor Lines, Inc., 225 N.C. 588, 35 S.E. 2d 879; Morgan v. Turnage Co., 213 N.C. 425, 196 S.E. 307; Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N.C. 197, 185 S.E. 767; Barbee v. Cannady, 191 N.C. 529, 132 S.E. 572; Joyner v. Fiber Co., 178 N.C. 634, 101 S.E. 373; Armfield Co. v. Saleeby, 178 N.C.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Underwood v. . DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. . WyldeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. General Insurance Company of America v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API