Burgess v. Trevathan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.
This appeal falls under the ban of the general rule that ordinarily an order allowing a motion for the joinder of an additional party is not appealable. In consequence, it must be dismissed. Raleigh v. Edwards, 234 N.C. 528, 67 S.E. 2d 669; Golbert v. Collins, 227 N.C. 395, 42 S.E. 2d 349; Insurance Co. v. Motor Lines, Inc., 225 N.C. 588, 35 S.E. 2d 879; Morgan v. Turnage Co., 213 N.C. 425, 196 S.E. 307; Wilmington v. Board of Education, 210 N.C. 197, 185 S.E. 767; Barbee v. Cannady, 191 N.C. 529, 132 S.E. 572; Joyner v. Fiber Co., 178 N.C. 634, 101 S.E. 373; Armfield Co. v. Saleeby, 178 N.C.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Underwood v. . DooleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. . WyldeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- General Insurance Company of America v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.