Legal Opinion

Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. Grannick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1953No. 244PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEkviN, J.

Inasmuch as the motion to strike the third further answer and defense from the answer is based on its supposed irrelevancy, the plaintiff’s appeal presents this question for decision: Where a collision between the motor vehicles of the plaintiff and the defendant results in personal injuries to third persons riding in the motor vehicle of the defendant, and the plaintiff and the defendant, acting in concert out of court, compromise and settle extrajudicial claims made against them by the injured third persons, do the compromise settlements bar a subsequent action in negligence by the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Wallace & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  2. Balazs v. LiebenthalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. Floyd v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gibson v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API