Legal Opinion

Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1965No. 463PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike is addressed to defendant’s further answer and defense in its entirety and in substance, if not in form, is a demurrer. The court, in allowing plaintiff’s motion to strike, in effect sustained a demurrer to defendant’s further answer and defense. Jewell v. Price, 259 N.C. 345, 348, 130 S.E. 2d 668, and cases cited.

In considering plaintiff’s motion to strike (demurrer), the facts alleged by defendant are deemed admitted. Jenkins & Co. v. Lewis, 259 N.C. 86, 88, 130 S.E. 2d 49; Pack v. McCoy, 251 N.C. 590, 112 S.E. 2d 118; Trust Co. v. Currin, 244 N.C. 102, 92 S.E.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Choate Rental Co. v. JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Herring v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. CurrinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Reliance Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Woolard v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API