Legal Opinion

Hinson v. Dawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1956No. 305PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

At the conclusion of trial of' this cause at August-September Term, 1954, of Wayne, judgment was entered that plaintiff recover nothing from defendants. Plaintiff appealed. A partial new trial was ordered, as appears in Hinson v. Dawson, 241 N.C. 714, 86 S.E. 2d 585. There was a final adjudication that the injuries received by plaintiff’s intestate in the automobile collision on 20 December, 1953, did not proximately cause his death on 27 January, 1954; and, after certification of the opinion, judgment was entered in the superior court to that effect. Thereafter, plaintiff was permitted to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Belk v. RosamondMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API