A. M. Todd Co. v. Farmers' Mutual Fire-Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Allegan; Padgham, J. Decided July 16, 1904. Assumpsit by the A. M. Todd Company, Limited, against the Farmers’ Mutual Fire-Insurance Company of Allegan and Ottawa Counties on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
This is an action brought upon an in-'^ surance policy issued by the defendant to Albert M. Todd. Prior to the issuing of the policy in question, Mr. Todd held a policy in the company. Mr. Todd wanted some additional insurance, and a new policy was issued, which is the policy in question. On or about January 1, 1902, the plaintiff company was organized, and became the owner of the property covered by the insurance. Albert M. Todd assigned his interest in said policy to it on the 13th day of January, 1902, and the same was approved by the secretary of the defendant company. On the 10th day of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Sugg v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Boyer v. Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Shelden v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Cronin v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Showalter v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Benham v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.