Legal Opinion

Shelden v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Allan Shelden against the Michigan Millers’ Mutual Fire-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

On December 9th, Tuckey made an application in writing for insurance in the defendant com-*305party upon his gristmill, — $1,000 upon the mill building, and $1,000 on machinery, tools, implements, and fixtures therein. The application was in the handwriting of the insured, and was signed by him. It contained the following :

‘ ‘ What is the present cash value of the property to be insured, exclusive of land and property not specified? $10,000. * * _*

‘' How much insurance is there now on this property? None.

“ Give schedule of all insurance on back hereof. What will be the total insurance on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Buren v. St. Joseph County Village Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Ætna Insurance v. ReshMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. American Insurance v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Briggs v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Niles v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moore v. First Security Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Boyer v. Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. A. M. Todd Co. v. Farmers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McGannon v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Benham v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API