Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by Peter Boyer against the Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Prior to January 18, 1899, plaintiff owned a stock of goods in the city of Grand Rapids, upon which the defendant had a $1,000 policy of insurance, “the loss, if any, payable to George H: Reeder, trustee, as his interest may appear.” The plaintiff desired to remove the stock to Holland, and the following indorsement was made upon the policy:

“Permission is hereby granted to remove the insured property to the three-story, composition roof, brick building, occupied as a boot and shoe store, and situated at No. 73 East Eighth street, in the city of Holland, Mich. Insurance to cease at the former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Smith v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bates v. Detroit Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Shelden v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Knight & Jillson Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. King v. Concordia Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Packard Manufacturing Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. A. M. Todd Co. v. Farmers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bastian v. British American Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API