Boyer v. Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by Peter Boyer against the Grand Rapids Fire-Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Prior to January 18, 1899, plaintiff owned a stock of goods in the city of Grand Rapids, upon which the defendant had a $1,000 policy of insurance, “the loss, if any, payable to George H: Reeder, trustee, as his interest may appear.” The plaintiff desired to remove the stock to Holland, and the following indorsement was made upon the policy:
“Permission is hereby granted to remove the insured property to the three-story, composition roof, brick building, occupied as a boot and shoe store, and situated at No. 73 East Eighth street, in the city of Holland, Mich. Insurance to cease at the former…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Smith v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Bates v. Detroit Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Shelden v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Knight & Jillson Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- King v. Concordia Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Packard Manufacturing Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- A. M. Todd Co. v. Farmers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Bastian v. British American Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.