Legal Opinion

Gechijian v. Richmond Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The policies of fire insurance upon which these actions are brought covered personal property in the plaintiff’s photographic studio. All of the policies are in the Massachusetts standard form; all are dated either December 3 or December 4, 1930; and all contain the following provision: “This policy shall be void ... if the insured shall make any attempt to defraud the Company either before or after the loss.”

On December 23, 1930, a destructive fire occurred in the studio. On January 7, 1931, the plaintiff “filed” with the companies’ adjusters an unsigned typewritten list entitled, “Fire Loss…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Phoenix Life Ins. Co. v. RaddinSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Dolan v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Medley v. German Alliance InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bockser v. Dorchester Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Krantz v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Paloeian v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Ben Elfman & Sons, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API