Cronin v. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Michael B. Cronin and Thomas Cronin, for the use and benefit of Milton M. Rose, against the Fire Association of Philadelphia, on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
This cause is before us for the third time, on writ of error sued out by the defendant. Our former opinions in relation to it are reported in 112 Mich. 106 (70 N. W. 448), and 119 Mich. 74 (77 N. W. 648). Upon the last trial the court left to the jury the following questions :
1. Was the policy issued upon a written application, as alleged by the defendant ?
2. Was the creamery idle for 10 consecutive days ?
3. Was the policy avoided by a failure to procure the defendant’s consent to foreclosure proceedings against the property ?.
It is claimed that it was error to submit either of these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cleaver v. Traders' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Carpenter v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Kitchen v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Allemania Fire Insurance v. HurdMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Cronin v. Fire Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kentucky Vermillion Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- A. M. Todd Co. v. Farmers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- McGannon v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Benham v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Brehm Lumber Co. v. Svea Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.