Legal Opinion

Queen Insurance v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1888PublishedCited by 83 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court, of Montgomery. Tried ‘before tbe Hon. John P. Hubbard. This action was brought by Mrs. Effie Young, a married woman, against the Queen Insurance Company of Liverpool, a foreign corporation; and was founded on a policy of insurance on a stock of goods against loss or damage by fire, which the plaintiff had effected in her own name with the defendant. The policy was dated November 13, 1886, for $2,000, and the risk continued for one year.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court, of Montgomery. Tried ‘before tbe Hon. John P. Hubbard. This action was brought by Mrs. Effie Young, a married woman, against the Queen Insurance Company of Liverpool, a foreign corporation; and was founded on a policy of insurance on a stock of goods against loss or damage by fire, which the plaintiff had effected in her own name with the defendant. The policy was dated November 13, 1886, for $2,000, and the risk continued for one year. The stock of goods was badly damaged by fire in March, 1887, and the' action was brought on the 20th September, 1887. The…

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

The action is brought by appellee, on a policy insuring a stock of goods against loss or damage by fire. On the evidence, there can be no controversy as to the destruction of the goods, or their value. It is only necessary to consider the questions arising on the special defenses. These are: 1st, want of insurable interest; 2d, concealment of a fact material to the risk; and, 3d, forfeiture of the policy.

The averments of the plea, setting up. want of insurable interest, are, that plaintiff was a married woman, under the disabilities of coverture, at the time of the issuance of the policy, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Knapp v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. Piedmont & Arlington Life Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Marks v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Society of United States v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Syndicate Insurance v. CatchingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API