Legal Opinion

Van Horn Lodge, Inc. v. White

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1981No. 4447PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the superior court erred in ruling that a legal *642malpractice action was barred by Alaska's two year statute of limitations, AS 09.10.-070.1

Van Horn Lodge, Inc., and two of its officers, Daniel Barnett and Howard Groff (hereinafter referred to collectively as Van Horn) began an action in the superior court against Hugh White and Paul Jones, Van Horn’s former attorneys. The complaint alleged professional malpractice on the part of White and Jones. The superior court concluded that Van Horn’s action was barred by AS 09.10.070, since the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Silverton v. MarlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Greater Area Inc. v. BookmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Thomas v. ClearyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API