Legal Opinion
Austin v. Fulton Insurance Company
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1968No. 911PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before NESBETT, C. J., and DIMOND and RABINOWITZ, JJ. DIMOND, Justice.
The 1964 earthquake in Anchorage caused substantial damage to appellant’s real property. The property had been insured against various losses by appellee, Fulton Insurance Company. Fulton refused to recognize the loss by earthquake as covered by the insurance policies, and appellant brought this action for damages.
The policies excluded from insurance coverage loss by earthquake. 1 However, in spite of this exclusion appellant claimed relief on five separate theories: (1) that appellees Fulton and Pfeifer 2 had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Barrow Development Company, Inc. v. The Fulton Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.