Greater Area Inc. v. Bookman
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether the superior court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of an attorney who allegedly committed malpractice. To resolve the question, we must determine whether the lower court correctly ruled that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We hold that summary judgment was improperly granted.
Early in 1976, attorney Bruce Bookman was engaged to assist in the formation of Greater Area Incorporated [GAI], a corporation designed to provide taxi services. Mr. Bookman participated in several organizational meetings…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Alfred Gerome Nelson and Vida Nelson v. International Paint CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Hanebuth v. Bell Helicopter InternationalAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.