Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Cleary
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1989No. S-1761, S-1828PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. BURKE, Justice.
Eugene and Florence Cleary sued Donald Thomas, Theodore Sherwin, and the accounting firm of Thomas, Head and Greisen1 (THG) for professional malpractice. *1091Following a nine-day trial, a jury found the defendants negligent and concluded that their negligence was the proximate cause of damage to the Clearys in the amount of $212,269.
The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J.N.O.V.) or a new trial claiming, among other things, that (1) the damages awarded were excessive in that they…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Leonhart v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Lien v. McGladrey & PullenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- RTR Technologies, Inc. v. HelmingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.