Legal Opinion
Barry v. Learner
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1931No. Docket No. 7506PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $9,500 claimed to be due as commissions in connection with the sale of a ship. The complaint was filed on August 18, 1925, and defendants answered on December 9, 1925. Four years later and on December 7, 1929, pursuant to a motion made by the defendants for such purpose, the trial court dismissed the action upon the ground that the same had not been brought to trial within the statutory period of two. years after the answer had been filed, as required by section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prior to its amendment in 1929…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Tuolumne Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Marks v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hassey v. S. San Francisco Homestead & R.R. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Knight v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.