Legal Opinion

Marks v. Keenan

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1905No. S.F. No. 3482PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order dismissing the action for want of prosecution. The general rule is that the disposition of a motion to dismiss an action for want of prosecution rests in the discretion of the trial court, and that its action on such motion will not be disturbed here unless such discretion has been grossly abnsed. We see no such abuse of discretion in this case. After the filing of the complaint and the issuing of the summons nothing was done towards serving the summons until more than a year had elapsed. During that time the summons was not given to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferris v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Witter v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Barry v. LearnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Grass v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API