Legal Opinion

Steinbauer v. Bondesen

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1932No. Docket No. 8343PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order and judgment of dismissal, granted upon motion of certain defendants, now respondents herein, made upon the ground that there had been an unreasonable delay in bringing the action to trial.

Plaintiff is the assignee of eighty (80) claimants against eighty-six (86) defendants, and the action is to enforce certain claims against the defendants upon their liability as stockholders of a corporation known as Pacific Preserve Company, the claims being variously for goods, wares and merchandise sold, or services rendered, to said corporation.

The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Johnston v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Breckenridge v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API