Legal Opinion

Mather v. Mather

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1943No. L. A. 17608PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff and certain defendants appeal from a final judgment, from an order granting a motion for entry thereof nunc pro tunc, and from an order denying a motion to set aside such judgment and the order granting entry thereof.

The facts necessary to a correct understanding of the respective positions of the parties involved may be chronologically recorded as follows:

On August 3, 1934, the plaintiff commenced this action for rescission of a certain property settlement made between himself and his former wife, the defendant Anna Inez Mather. The complaint contained three counts for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Barry v. LearnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API