Mather v. Mather
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff and certain defendants appeal from a final judgment, from an order granting a motion for entry thereof nunc pro tunc, and from an order denying a motion to set aside such judgment and the order granting entry thereof.
The facts necessary to a correct understanding of the respective positions of the parties involved may be chronologically recorded as follows:
On August 3, 1934, the plaintiff commenced this action for rescission of a certain property settlement made between himself and his former wife, the defendant Anna Inez Mather. The complaint contained three counts for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Barry v. LearnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.