Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Guild

California Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13523PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet, his title to certain real property. On June 25, 1931, judgment was entered quieting the defendant’s title. No notice of entry of judgment was ever served. On September 30, 1931, more than sixty days after the entry of judgment, the plaintiff filed his notice of intention to move for a new trial. Defendant having failed to serve notice of the entry of judgment, the new trial proceedings were seasonably instituted. (Sec. 659, Code Civ. Proc.; Gross v. Hazeltine, 206 Cal. 130, 132 [273 Pac. 550].) The motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barry v. LearnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Bates v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Bley v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Schainman v. KierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Sharpe v. SharpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API