Legal Opinion
Panno v. Russo
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1947No. Civ. 15722PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This is an action for damages arising out of the alleged breach by a partnership of a contract to sell to plaintiff a crop of oranges. Louis Russo, the active member of the partnership, and who conducted the transaction here involved, died prior to the commencement of the action. Plaintiff joined as defendants the surviving partners, the administratrix of the estate of the deceased partner, and others. Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the surviving partners and the administratrix, this appeal is prosecuted.
In his complaint plaintiff alleged that on November 23, 1943, Russo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Cullinan v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Sessions v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Coates v. Lake View Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.