Legal Opinion

Jones v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1941No. L. A. 17315PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIS, J. —

The defendants prosecute this appeal from a judgment enforcing a written contract to devise property and decreeing that plaintiff is the equitable owner thereof and entitled to its conveyance, the defendants holding it in trust for her use and benefit. The principal issue on the appeal has to do with the asserted insufficiency of the evidence to support such judgment.

It appears that in August, 1935, the plaintiff, a married niece of the testatrix, was living in Acworth, New Hampshire, where she and her husband owned several parcels of real property. At about this time the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wolf v. DonahueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Furman v. CraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Davis v. JacobyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ludwicki v. GuerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Goldstein v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API