Legal Opinion

Coates v. Lake View Oil & Refining Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1937No. Civ. 1758PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiff recovered damages in the sum of $42,210.16 for the breach of a written contract whereby defendant agreed to furnish plaintiff motor fuel for one year commencing June 15, 1929. This appeal followed.

Defendant presents two grounds for reversal of the judgment: First, that the act of George E. Holmes, an employee of defendant, in signing the written contract which is the foundation of the action, was beyond the scope of his authority and not binding on defendant; and, second, that there is no evidence to support the findings of the amount of the damages awarded plaintiff.

After a study…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buie v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. McKay v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. McHose v. FulmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  4. Buie v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Roach Brothers & Co. v. Lactein Food Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gerwin v. Southeastern California Ass'n of Seventh Day AdventistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Panno v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Morello v. Growers Grape Products Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Bercut v. Park, Benziger & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API