Legal Opinion
Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1945No. Civ. 3279PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Action to foreclose crop mortgages' and for money had and received. There appears to he little or no variance between counsel for the respective parties as to their statements of facts in the instant case. They do not agree, however, as to the legal effect of those facts. We have examined the entire record and find defendant’s statement to be a full and fair recitation thereof. Therefore, we will adopt it for the purposes of this opinion.
“The Union Oil Company in 1925 entered into a Planter’s Agreement with Gaston A. Bastanchury, who immediately undertook the execution thereof. On November…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rennie & Laughlin, Inc., a Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- In Re: Bailey, Bruce Albion, Debtor. Jon J. Del Bino v. Bruce Albion BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Albuquerque National Bank v. Albuquerque Ranch Estates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Hartford Financial Corp. v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.