Legal Opinion
Cullinan v. McColgan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1927No. Docket No. 6016PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs, engaged in the practice of law, sued defendant Reginald McColgan, as surviving member of a copartnership of which his deceased brother, Daniel A. McColgan, was the other member, for the reasonable value of professional services rendered by plaintiffs to the copartnership. The action was commenced August 19, 1922'. The copartnership is admitted by the pleadings and so is the fact that it was engaged in a general loan and brokerage business. It is also admitted that the copartnership business was done under the names of both partners and also of each partner.
In…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People Ex Rel. Johnson v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hendricks v. HendricksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Panno v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.