Sessions v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, J. pro tem.
This ease presents appeals taken by both the plaintiff and defendant from a declaratory judgment, and so we shall refer to the parties here as they were referred to below.
This is a controversy between a former employee and a former employer as to what, if any, pension the former employee is entitled to receive from the former employer. The case is unique in that for several years both parties assumed that the employee was not only entitled to a pension but the pension was paid by the employer in an amount that both parties thought was correctly due. It was not until the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- W. M. W. N.W. Ry. Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Weatherford, Mineral Wells & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Brock v. ButtonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by18 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Panno v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.