Legal Opinion

Rau v. Manko

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1940No. Appeal, 291PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal brings up questions under the new Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellant complains that his petition to join an additional defendant was denied.

Plaintiff, Martha A. Rau, while riding in her automobile, driven by Thomas D. McBride, was injured by collision with another car operated by defendant at the intersection of Eleventh and Ruscomb Streets, Philadelphia. Plaintiff averred facts from which defendant’s negligence might be found by a jury and sought recovery for personal injuries and damage to her car. Defendant, Manko, by his answer, denied the negligent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Bailey v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Husak v. Berkel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API