Legal Opinion

PULLER (Et Al.) v. Puller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1955No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

The question here presented involves the construction of a certain provision in a policy of automobile liability insurance.

An automobile owned and operated by John W. Puller in which his wife, Dorothy, and his minor daughter, Mary, were passengers, collided at a grade crossing with a locomotive of the East Broad Top Railroad and Coal Company. All three of them were injured and they brought an action in trespass against the Railroad Company. The latter obtained a severance of Puller’s action and joined him as additional defendant in the suit of his wife…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Kaczorowski v. KalkosinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Encompass Insurance Co v. Stone Mansion Restaurant IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API