PULLER (Et Al.) v. Puller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
The question here presented involves the construction of a certain provision in a policy of automobile liability insurance.
An automobile owned and operated by John W. Puller in which his wife, Dorothy, and his minor daughter, Mary, were passengers, collided at a grade crossing with a locomotive of the East Broad Top Railroad and Coal Company. All three of them were injured and they brought an action in trespass against the Railroad Company. The latter obtained a severance of Puller’s action and joined him as additional defendant in the suit of his wife…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Kaczorowski v. KalkosinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Encompass Insurance Co v. Stone Mansion Restaurant IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.