Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
Alleging that she had been injured by reason of a defect in a footway pavement in the City of Philadelphia, plaintiff and her husband sued the city to recover damages for the injury she had sustained. Claiming that the Act of April 10, 1929, P. L. 479, gave it the right to bring upon the record, as additional defendants, those who would be liable over to it if a recovery was had against it in that suit, the city filed two affidavits therein, one alleging that the owners of the property had failed to keep the pavement in repair, and hence were thus liable over;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Philadelphia v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Duggan v. Duggan.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Marshall Impeachment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.