Legal Opinion

Husak v. Berkel, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1975No. Appeal, No. 102PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

This appeal is from the order of the lower court granting the motion for summary judgment of the additional defendant SCM Corporation (hereinafter SCM), and denying the motion for summary judgment of the original defendant Berkel Incorporated (hereinafter Berkel). Appellant Berkel argues that the decisions were improper *455because, as between SCM and Berkel, SCM alone could rightfully be held liable in the personal injury action brought by the plaintiff in this case. We agree that SCM’s motion for summary judgment was improperly granted and therefore reverse the lower…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API