Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Mitchell-Fletcher Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 5, 1928No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This proceeding, by the American Surety Company, in essence asks that it be subrogated to the rights of the plaintiffs in judgments obtained in an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries, brought by Gertrude Goldman and Sarah Goldman, against Mitchell-Fletcher Company and Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company. Both defendants appealed from the judgments to this court, the American Surety Company be- ( coming security for Mitchell-Fletcher Company on its appeal bond, in order to supersede execution on the judgments. The Philadelphia Rapid Transit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Churchill v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Bailey v. BussingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
- Seither v. Philad. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Musick, Peeler & Garrett v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.