Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
The question presented is whether a pretrial order dismissing the class aspects of a suit, but allowing the case to proceed as an individual action, is an appealable final order. We hold that it is.
Appellants Edward and Marie Bell brought a class action pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 2230 1 against appellee Ben eficial Consumer Discount Company alleging that appellee failed to record the satisfaction of mortgages as required by statute. 2 Appellee filed preliminary objections. The trial court sustained the preliminary objections to the suit as a class action, but…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jones v. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by272 opinions
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.