Catalano v. Falco

Opinion

In this personal injury action, the defendant Frank L. Falco1 appeals from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Paul Catalano, following a jury trial. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) allowed the expert testimony of the plaintiff’s witness regarding the possibility that the *87plaintiffs condition might require surgery at some future date and (2) denied his motion for a continuance of the trial date. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to our disposition of the defendant’s appeal. This action arose out of automobile…