Legal Opinion

Marchetti v. Ramirez

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 18, 1997No. 15417PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

In this certified appeal, we must decide whether the Appellate Court: (1) applied the proper legal test regarding the standard of proof necessary to support an award of future medical expenses in a tort action; and (2) properly affirmed the judgment of the trial court awarding future medical expenses. The plaintiff, William A. Marchetti, commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he had suffered when he was struck by a truck operated by the named defendant, Johnny Ramirez, and owned by the defendant A.P.A. Truck Leasing Company. After the trial court granted the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Jerz v. HumphreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Sheiman v. SheimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Marchetti v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lyons v. NicholsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Madsen v. GatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Musorofiti v. VlcekConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Nash v. YapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Doe v. Thames Valley Council for Community Action, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API