Legal Opinion
Ormsby v. Frankel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 1999No. AC 17621PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Emil Frankel, commissioner of transportation, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Carolyn Ormsby, on her complaint brought pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-144,1 the defective roads and highway statute. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted evidence pertaining to actual and constructive notice, (2) denied his motions to set aside the verdict and for a directed ver*100diet where there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of actual notice and constructive…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ormsby v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Cadle Co. v. ErratoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- 1525 Highland Associates, LLC v. FohlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Nicefaro v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. TinsleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.