Legal Opinion
Ormsby v. Frankel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 17, 2001No. SC 16187PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The issues in this certified appeal involve: (1) the admissibility of recurring icing conditions and a prior accident to prove constructive notice under General Statutes § lSa-144,1 the state defective *673highway statute; and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to prove constructive notice under that statute. Following our grant of certification, 2 the defendant, Emil Frankel, the commissioner of transportation, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court awarding damages to the plaintiff, Carolyn Ormsby. The defendant claims that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Jackson v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Smith v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Cadle Co. v. ErratoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.