Legal Opinion
Wexler v. DeMaio
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 3, 2006No. SC 17466PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
In this certified appeal,1 the plaintiffs, Howard Wexler and Judith Wexler,2 claim that the Appellate Court improperly affirmed the summary judgment rendered by the trial court after that court had precluded the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert witness. Specifically, the plaintiffs claim that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that their June 26, 2003 disclosure (June disclosure) of Peter H. Wiemik as an expert witness failed to comply with Practice Book § 13-4 (4).3 We agree and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
*171The opinion of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Lillian Weiss v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Klein v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. ChristieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Doyle v. KammConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.