Legal Opinion
St. Germain v. LaBrie
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 24, 2008No. AC 28380PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
In this action for injunctive relief, the pro se plaintiff, Edwin C. St. Germain, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the action against the defendants, Gary LaBrie, Richard Barber, Charles Zuch and Patricia Startz, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) dismissed his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, (2) denied his motion for disqualification of the judicial authority and for a mistrial, (3) failed to rule on his motion for a continuance and (4) permitted an unsworn “witness”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Prentice v. Dalco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Prentice v. Dalco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Zenon v. MossyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Citizens Against Overhead Power Line Construction v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Hernandez v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.