Legal Opinion
State v. Calderon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 2004No. AC 23499PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The pro se defendant, Marty Calderon, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of violation of a protective order under General Statutes § 53a-223. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) violated her constitutional rights to the effective assistance of counsel,1 (2) admitted hearsay into evidence, (3) denied her motion to order her daughter to undergo a competency evaluation prior to testifying, (4) violated her constitutional rights to confront and to cross-examine the witnesses against her, thereby denying her…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- United States v. Edward Grady PartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carpenter v. KlepperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
- State v. ColtherstConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. HindsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.