Legal Opinion
Conner v. Union Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1932No. Docket No. 4487PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against a surety company to recover damages which were sustained as the result of an automobile casualty.
The plaintiff secured" a judgment against the defendant surety company for the sum of $1340 as indemnity for damages sustained in an automobile collision. The insured machine was towing a trailer at the time the accident occurred. The policy contains the following exemption clauses “This policy does not cover ... (b) damage or expense while the automobile ... is operated, maintained or used . . . for towing or propelling any trailer,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Coolidge v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Sears v. Illinois Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Sam Wong v. Stuyvesant InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Brown v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
3Cited by25 opinions
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Rennie & Laughlin, Inc., a Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- López Castro v. Atlantic Southern InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2003
- Norman v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.