Legal Opinion
Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1957No. 15121PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Matsuo and Chisato Yoshida, husband and wife, obtained a judgment against one Sylvester Gonzales in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, in 1955 for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision occurring on April 15, 1953. The judgment unsatisfied, appellants instituted this action in the District Court to recover the amount of the award from Gonzales’ insurer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. The action, tried by the court without a jury, was successfully defended by the Company on the ground that Gonzales owned the vehicle…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, Mich. v. Winget Winget v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. Of Detroit, MichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Perlmuter Printing Co. v. Strome, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
- Sincoff v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
- Fresno Economy Import Used Cars, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.