Legal Opinion
Rennie & Laughlin, Inc., a Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1957No. 15210_1PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from an Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, dismissing its amended complaint and cause of action, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the amended complaint, assuming all well-pleaded facts to be true and indulging in all inferences which reasonably may be drawn therefrom, 1 sets forth facts sufficient to state a legal claim.
The original complaint…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- De Loach v. Crowley's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Edmonds v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Sue De La Cruz v. James TormeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.