Legal Opinion
Coolidge v. Standard Accident Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1931No. Docket No. 4335PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for a new trial in an action upon an insurance policy to enforce the refunding of money paid by the assured to satisfy a judgment against him which was recovered on account of an automobile casualty.
The defendant is an accident insurance corporation. The plaintiff carried an insurance policy with this company upon his Buiclc coach automobile. This policy specifically exempted the defendant from liability unless “the assured upon the occurrence of an accident, shall give immediate notice thereof”. It further provided that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Barclay v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Oakland Motor Co. v. American Fidelity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Aronson v. Frankfort Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Bonfils v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Michaelian v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.