Legal Opinion
Sears v. Illinois Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 1932No. Docket No. 506PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAMBERT, J., pro tem.
The facts leading up to this case are briefly that on the eighth day of May, 1927, Gilbert Angrimson owned a Buick automobile. This automobile was being driven by one Wilson Parker, who was then a boy of the age of fifteen years, four months and twenty-nine days. While he was driving the car an accident occurred in which the plaintiff and respondent herein, Helen Sears, sustained injuries. The respondent then sued Gilbert Angrimson, his wife, Gilbert Kent Angrimson, the son of Gilbert Angrimson, and his wife, and Wilson Parker, for damages for these injuries. At the time…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Bonfils v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.