Legal Opinion
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Richmond
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1977No. Civ. 49878PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON, J.
—Lonnie Richmond, doing business as Lonnie’s Sporting Goods (hereinafter referred to as Richmond), appeals from a judgment by the trial court, sitting without a jury; declaring that Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (hereinafter referred to as Aetna) has no duty to indemnify Richmond for personal injury damages recovered by a purchaser of skis on a theory of products liability.
Facts
On or about December 19, 1968, Olivia Ascascio purchased from Richmond a complete set of ski equipment and an employee working on Richmond’s premises affixed the bindings to the skis and specially…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Tidewater Associated Oil Company, a Corporation v. Northwest Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Miller v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fibreboard Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.