Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Saxe-Glassman Shoe Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 17, 1953No. 4658_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., has petitioned this court for enforcement of its order of December 10, 1951, under § 10(c) of the Act, against the respondent Saxe-Glassman Shoe 'Corporation.
The respondent is a Maine corporation and is engaged in the manufacture of women’s shoes in Saco, Maine. It concedes that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act.
In proceedings instituted by United Shoe Workers, CIO (hereinafter called the Union) the Board found…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- National Labor Relations Board v. SidranCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Suzanne J. GOSS, Appellant in No. 83-1598 v. EXXON OFFICE SYSTEMS COMPANY, Appellant in No. 83-1557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Kroen v. Bedway Security Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. Buitoni Foods Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., Frosty Morn DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.