Legal Opinion

State v. Brust

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 1988No. C87-06-33045; CA A46508PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

The state appeals an order allowing defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, arguing that an affidavit in support of search warrant provided probable cause for a search of defendant’s residence. We agree and reverse.

The affidavit stated that the affiant, Bret J. Smith, was an officer with the City of Portland Police Bureau and had been assigned to the narcotics detail for six months at the time he executed the affidavit on May 23, 1987. Smith received two anonymous complaints regarding an alleged marijuana growing operation at defendant’s home. Informant #1 reported defendant’s name, address…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. Christen/HankinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State v. MellingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. MacOmberOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. StranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. AranaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API