Legal Opinion

State v. Strance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 1993No. 90-1713; CA A73380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for manufacture, delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motions to controvert the information in the search warrant affidavit, to suppress the evidence seized under the search warrant, and to dismiss the indictment for the state’s failure to submit information about an informant to the court. We affirm.

On October 1, 1990, police searched defendant’s house pursuant to a search warrant. Officer Coates was the affiant for the affidavit in support of the search warrant. In the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. CarlileOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Taylor v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MilksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API