Legal Opinion

State v. Prince

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 1988No. 8605 1174; CA A42230PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The issue is whether the supporting affidavit is sufficient. We affirm.

The first paragraphs of Officer Curths’ affidavit detail his extensive training, experience and knowledge of marijuana growing operations, including an explanation of how they helped him conclude that defendant probably was growing marijuana.

The affidavit also relates information that was provided by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. FutchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. GaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API