State v. Spriggs
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant was convicted of the manufacture, possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1); ORS 475.992(4). Before trial, he moved to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The court denied the motion. Defendant appeals, assigning error to that denial. We affirm.
On February 16,1993, Officer Henry of the McMinnville Police Department applied for a warrant to search defendant’s home. In the affidavit, Henry stated that he was contacted by a confidential and reliable informant (CRI), who had not previously provided information to the police. The CRI told Henry…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. BrothertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AranaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995