Legal Opinion

State v. Spriggs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 1995No. CR93-237; CA A82311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was convicted of the manufacture, possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1); ORS 475.992(4). Before trial, he moved to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The court denied the motion. Defendant appeals, assigning error to that denial. We affirm.

On February 16,1993, Officer Henry of the McMinnville Police Department applied for a warrant to search defendant’s home. In the affidavit, Henry stated that he was contacted by a confidential and reliable informant (CRI), who had not previously provided information to the police. The CRI told Henry…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. AlvarezOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. State v. BrothertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AranaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API