Legal Opinion

State v. Christen/Hankins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1986No. 10-84-02598, 10-84-02600 CA A35401 (Control), CA A35412PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendants were convicted in a consolidated trial of unlawful manufacture and possession of a controlled substance in violation of ORS 475.992. They filed motions to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and motions to controvert the affidavit made in support of the warrant. The trial court denied the motions to suppress and, with minor exceptions, denied the motions to controvert. In a consolidated appeal, defendants contest the denial of these motions.

The principal issue in this case is whether the affidavit contained sufficient information from which a magistrate could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HorwedelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
  5. State v. LedbetterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API